![Reply](https://www.thorforums.com/forums/images/thor/buttons/reply.gif) |
|
05-21-2018, 01:21 AM
|
#1
|
Axis/Vegas Enthusiast
Brand: Thor Motor Coach
Model: Axis 24.4
State: Michigan
Posts: 9,837
THOR #1150
|
Interesting experience with a rental...truck
I've spent this past week helping family move back to MI from FL.
We rented a 16ft truck and when I drove it off the lot from the rental place I thought "wow this truck feels really familiar"!
So I did what anyone would do: I looked up the VIN online LOL.
The truck:
2014 E-350 with the V-10...
Our Axis:
2014 E-350 with the V-10... !
Of course our Axis doesn't have the 133,000 miles that the rental had (it ran without a hiccup for the 1300 miles we needed it to). It also got close to 10mpg.
As expected, when empty there was very little wallowing to the suspension. Once loaded it drove more like our RV...
|
|
|
05-21-2018, 02:00 AM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Brand: Thor Motor Coach
Model: S.O.B.
State: California
Posts: 1,368
THOR #3483
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JamieGeek
I've spent this past week helping family move back to MI from FL.
We rented a 16ft truck and when I drove it off the lot from the rental place I thought "wow this truck feels really familiar"!
So I did what anyone would do: I looked up the VIN online LOL.
The truck:
2014 E-350 with the V-10...
Our Axis:
2014 E-350 with the V-10... !
Of course our Axis doesn't have the 133,000 miles that the rental had (it ran without a hiccup for the 1300 miles we needed it to). It also got close to 10mpg.
As expected, when empty there was very little wallowing to the suspension. Once loaded it drove more like our RV...
|
Wow, small world Jamie! We just helped a friend move her vehicles from outside Nashville to Reno, NV. I had the luck to drive a 26' box UHaul with a Ford F650 AND a 12 foot UHaul trailer. Thank God I wired up my portable Sirius receiver. 2150 miles and 7.7 MPG. Some of the grades outside Park City, UT I was doing about 30-35 with my foot all the way to the floor... Made me appreciate the 24.1 Axis when trying to get into regular gas. By the way, their was a BIG sticker on the gas tank NOT to use E85 gas and stick with E87. I looked again at the E450 owners' manual at Ford and it is a bit confusing on the issue but still recommends sticking with E87 fuel. What an experience. Oh yeah, Nebraska highways extremely suck. Reminds me of the 91 freeway in Riverside, CA with the bumps...
__________________
|
|
|
05-22-2018, 12:38 AM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Brand: Thor Motor Coach
Model: 2023 Jayco Precept 31UL
State: Florida
Posts: 2,914
THOR #1589
|
Back to MI from FL? That's called Boomerang!
__________________
Life is better when you cry a little, laugh a lot, and are thankful for everything you've got!
|
|
|
05-22-2018, 01:00 AM
|
#4
|
Senior Member
Brand: Thor Motor Coach
Model: ACE 30.3
State: Illinois
Posts: 371
THOR #8503
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by axis earl
Wow, small world Jamie! We just helped a friend move her vehicles from outside Nashville to Reno, NV. I had the luck to drive a 26' box UHaul with a Ford F650 AND a 12 foot UHaul trailer. Thank God I wired up my portable Sirius receiver. 2150 miles and 7.7 MPG. Some of the grades outside Park City, UT I was doing about 30-35 with my foot all the way to the floor... Made me appreciate the 24.1 Axis when trying to get into regular gas. By the way, their was a BIG sticker on the gas tank NOT to use E85 gas and stick with E87. I looked again at the E450 owners' manual at Ford and it is a bit confusing on the issue but still recommends sticking with E87 fuel. What an experience. Oh yeah, Nebraska highways extremely suck. Reminds me of the 91 freeway in Riverside, CA with the bumps...
|
Was that I-80 in NE?
__________________
Wayne & Jo Roe
Retired USAF
Thor ACE 30.3
FMCA #F479085
Good Sam #848205704
|
|
|
05-22-2018, 01:16 AM
|
#5
|
Senior Member
Brand: Still Looking
Model: SOB
State: South Dakota
Posts: 941
THOR #3916
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by axis earl
By the way, their was a BIG sticker on the gas tank NOT to use E85 gas and stick with E87. I looked again at the E450 owners' manual at Ford and it is a bit confusing on the issue but still recommends sticking with E87 fuel. What an experience. Oh yeah, Nebraska highways extremely suck. Reminds me of the 91 freeway in Riverside, CA with the bumps...
|
The 87 is for octane level ie: regular unleaded with no alcohol added..the E-85 is 85% alcohol..not good stuff for a heavy duty/severe service internal combustion engine me thinks....
__________________
current coach
An SOB Shack called Foretravel...This will Do.
former coach
Thor Infinity
|
|
|
05-22-2018, 01:52 AM
|
#6
|
Senior Member
Brand: Still Looking
State: Texas
Posts: 6,187
THOR #2121
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JamieGeek
.....cut....
So I did what anyone would do: I looked up the VIN online LOL.
The truck:
2014 E-350 with the V-10...
Our Axis:
2014 E-350 with the V-10... !
.....cut....
|
Jamie, I’m curious if VIN indicated whether it had 176” wheelbase, or something different?
Also, did it have a 40-gallon fuel tank, or 55 like your Axis?
__________________
|
|
|
05-22-2018, 03:37 AM
|
#7
|
Senior Member
Brand: Thor Motor Coach
Model: S.O.B.
State: California
Posts: 1,368
THOR #3483
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wayneroe
Was that I-80 in NE?
|
Yes, it was. Pretty bad. What's the story?
__________________
|
|
|
05-22-2018, 03:39 AM
|
#8
|
Senior Member
Brand: Thor Motor Coach
Model: S.O.B.
State: California
Posts: 1,368
THOR #3483
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by saddlesore
The 87 is for octane level ie: regular unleaded with no alcohol added..the E-85 is 85% alcohol..not good stuff for a heavy duty/severe service internal combustion engine me thinks....
|
87 still has ethanol, around 10%, at least here in CA.
__________________
|
|
|
05-22-2018, 04:05 AM
|
#9
|
Senior Member
Brand: Thor Motor Coach
Model: ACE 30.3
State: Illinois
Posts: 371
THOR #8503
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by axis earl
Yes, it was. Pretty bad. What's the story?
|
No story, but I am heading that way at the end of June, going from home (St. Louis area) to Salt Lake City. I had been wondering how I-80 was across NE, WY, and UT. I was on it last week in IN and it was pretty bad there.
__________________
Wayne & Jo Roe
Retired USAF
Thor ACE 30.3
FMCA #F479085
Good Sam #848205704
|
|
|
05-22-2018, 11:25 AM
|
#10
|
Axis/Vegas Enthusiast
Brand: Thor Motor Coach
Model: Axis 24.4
State: Michigan
Posts: 9,837
THOR #1150
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chance
Jamie, I’m curious if VIN indicated whether it had 176” wheelbase, or something different?
Also, did it have a 40-gallon fuel tank, or 55 like your Axis?
|
40-gallon fuel tank (which surprised me)--could barely get 300 miles before the light would come on.
138" wheelbase (only a 16 footer)--at least that is what the VIN decoder says.
|
|
|
05-22-2018, 11:46 AM
|
#11
|
I Think We're Lost!
Brand: Still Looking
Model: Tiffin Wayfarer 24 BW
State: New York
Posts: 22,195
THOR #8860
|
...Kind of like dancing with the Girl that you took to your Senior Prom....
...At your 25th reunion!
__________________
"What: me worry?"
Good Sam Member 843599689
Current coach: Tiffin Wayfarer 24 BW
|
|
|
05-22-2018, 12:42 PM
|
#12
|
Axis/Vegas Enthusiast
Brand: Thor Motor Coach
Model: Axis 24.4
State: Michigan
Posts: 9,837
THOR #1150
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Denman
...Kind of like dancing with the Girl that you took to your Senior Prom....
...At your 25th reunion! ![Big Grin](https://www.thorforums.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
|
Wouldn't know: haven't gone to any of my reunions.... ![Lol](https://www.thorforums.com/forums/images/smilies/sk/lol.gif)
|
|
|
05-22-2018, 01:05 PM
|
#13
|
I Think We're Lost!
Brand: Still Looking
Model: Tiffin Wayfarer 24 BW
State: New York
Posts: 22,195
THOR #8860
|
Trust me: you won't BELIEVE how old those other folks got!! ![Lol](https://www.thorforums.com/forums/images/smilies/sk/lol.gif)
__________________
"What: me worry?"
Good Sam Member 843599689
Current coach: Tiffin Wayfarer 24 BW
|
|
|
05-22-2018, 02:02 PM
|
#14
|
Senior Member
Brand: Still Looking
State: Texas
Posts: 6,187
THOR #2121
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JamieGeek
40-gallon fuel tank (which surprised me)--could barely get 300 miles before the light would come on.
138" wheelbase (only a 16 footer)--at least that is what the VIN decoder says.
|
The reason I asked such a specific and strange question is that I’ve been curious as to why motorhome manufacturers don’t use the available 176” wheelbase chassis to a greater extent.
A few weeks ago I saw two separate +/- 16’ moving trucks in the neighborhood like the one below, and it appeared from a distance that neither chassis had stretched wheelbase like typical Class Cs. The picture looks about right with ~ 10’ ahead of axle and ~ 6’ behind.
There are so many Class Cs in the 24 ~ 26 foot range that could be built on the unaltered 176” chassis that there must be a good reason as to why they don’t use it more. Why go to expense and trouble? The only spec that I’ve read that seemed odd was that 55-gallon fuel tank was only available on 158” wheelbase motorhome cutaway chassis.
If for some reason the 176” WB chassis is limited to 40-gallon fuel tank, I could see that being a problem in RVs getting 8 MPG, or sometimes less. You’d have to fill up every +/- 250 miles, and that assumes not running generator too much.
__________________
|
|
|
05-22-2018, 02:12 PM
|
#15
|
Senior Member
Brand: Thor Motor Coach
Model: THOR Chateua 35SF
State: Florida
Posts: 5,850
THOR #11130
|
Not sure if it applies here but Ford offers (or used to) a "Lo-Pro" chassis in some models. It's a lowered frame for motorhomes, ambulances, etc., whereby frequent step-up type access is desired. Sometimes in includes the "C" arch over the rear axle opposed to the straight frame of the regular configuration. Maybe this is part of the equation?
__________________
Now an SOB
Traded Thor for Melbourne Prestige 24NP
2018 THOR Chateau 35SF
Two Labs, Bugsie & Blondie
Blondie passed in 2020 at 5 to Leukemia
|
|
|
05-22-2018, 02:26 PM
|
#16
|
I Think We're Lost!
Brand: Still Looking
Model: Tiffin Wayfarer 24 BW
State: New York
Posts: 22,195
THOR #8860
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chance
The reason I asked such a specific and strange question is that I’ve been curious as to why motorhome manufacturers don’t use the available 176” wheelbase chassis to a greater extent.
|
Perhaps it has a little bit to do with all of that extra rear overhang, that would result from using it?
__________________
"What: me worry?"
Good Sam Member 843599689
Current coach: Tiffin Wayfarer 24 BW
|
|
|
05-22-2018, 02:33 PM
|
#17
|
Senior Member
Brand: Still Looking
State: Texas
Posts: 6,187
THOR #2121
|
All E-Series have lower, and also curved, frame rails over rear axle.
By comparison, all F-53 chassis have straight chassis rails. The two are very different and shouldn’t be confused. The F-53 is much heavier duty and truck-like. The E-Series is based on Econoline van design, which explains the curved rails over rear axle.
I believe the fuel tank size may be limited on 176” WB because the overall chassis length, according to specs, is identical to that of 158” WB. As such, the rear overhang on 176” WB must be 18” shorter. That “may” explain why a larger 55-gallon tank isn’t available with 176” WB, but I’m not certain of that either.
__________________
|
|
|
05-22-2018, 02:47 PM
|
#18
|
I Think We're Lost!
Brand: Still Looking
Model: Tiffin Wayfarer 24 BW
State: New York
Posts: 22,195
THOR #8860
|
Is it time to crawl up under some trucks and RVs?
We need fuel tank sizes, and the amount of space that is available...
__________________
"What: me worry?"
Good Sam Member 843599689
Current coach: Tiffin Wayfarer 24 BW
|
|
|
05-22-2018, 02:58 PM
|
#19
|
Axis/Vegas Enthusiast
Brand: Thor Motor Coach
Model: Axis 24.4
State: Michigan
Posts: 9,837
THOR #1150
|
Here is the guy we rented:
|
|
|
05-22-2018, 06:59 PM
|
#20
|
Senior Member
Brand: Still Looking
State: Texas
Posts: 6,187
THOR #2121
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JamieGeek
|
Thanks.
Yeah, that’s not a 138” WB as seen in final form. If it started at 138” then it got stretched also like your Axis.
The 176” WB chassis has a cab-to-axle dimension of 118”, or just under 10’. If it were on 138” WB, more than half of box would be behind axle.
Again, not sure why anyone would cut and stretch a chassis if they could buy it the right length to start with.
__________________
|
|
|
![Reply](https://www.thorforums.com/forums/images/thor/buttons/reply.gif) |
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|