Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidEM
In my experience T Mobile works great in cities and along interstates, but not if you get off of the beaten path.
So, I am looking forward to Starlink mobile.
David
|
Yep... don't even think about boondocking away from major population areas... or camping in remote mountain spots... or driving roads off the beaten path. As long as you stick to major freeways you'll nearly always be in range of a tower. I'm amazed at the amount of money people throw away on equipment trying to magically solve a baked-in communications infrastructure shortcoming.
Telcomms have done the math and know EXACTLY the minimum number of subscribers needed to make "coverage areas" worth their while. It's the same reason you rarely if ever see advertising billboards in remote areas... not enough "potentially paying" eyes on them. Telcomm coverage area WILL NOT get any better unless their subscriber base moves. They KNOW coverage is limited.
If you wade through all the 5G buzz you'll discover it's just marketing glitz - another attempt at squeezing more data through a pipe that's already at it's limits. Look at data coverage maps... not surprising they're in the EXACT coverage areas where 4G is. 5G is in NO WAY intended to solve the "remote access to internet" problem faced by millions of RVers who like to get away from civilization.
Not that I always agree with Musk, but if he follows through with his plan, it will completely solve the remote internet issue. And I believe it will put pressure on the major tower based telcomms to compete with lower prices. BUT, tower based systems will NEVER solve the data speed problem. While Musk has stated it's NOT his intention to encroach on land based systems, how can he avoid that?
When (if) Starlink finally opens up to full-fledged mobile connectivity, it will be a massive game changer... on the scale of the release of the first iPhone.