Thor Forums

[ducksface]

Originally Posted by axis earl

Sounds good but an uninformed voter can do more damage than by not voting. A good example of that is the referendum process in California. People get inundated with propositions that are usually quite difficult to understand and are lied about in their campaign ads. Most people don't bother to read who is actually funding the proposition. I would rather that people who don't bother to do their own research and not just follow a TV ad stay at home and skip it until they responsibly vote.

Pretty much as said above.

Voting without knowing is a form of theft.
I'd just as well the happily ignorant stay happily at home.
Just because you can vote doesn't mean you should vote.
I'd rather someone with a felony conviction for election fraud be allowed to vote than someone who votes on the candidates personality.

I know someone who voted for George 2 because 'he's such a pretty man and I love his accent'. I am sickened, but you sometimes don't get to pick the friends you love, they just happen.
I follow politics so little I STILL don't know if George 2 was Democrat or Republicans. (oddly, my phone capitalized Democrat but not republican).

I too, can't begin to care less about your political stance or lack thereof.
Personally, I have no political stance. Never have.

No matter who or what, as long as the playing field is level, I'll be happier by not having a 'side'. .