Quote:
Originally Posted by dkoldman
Trust? Cherry picking? Not sure I caught the point in full, but did I say something that was wrong, or misinformed? I will correct any errors I can before the edit windows closes.
|
You did not say anything wrong at all. I just have substantial questions. First we a vax that appears to help depending on which study used. A lot of early discussion was testing, testing? What results of testing, contact tracing and those who had already gotten? I know of 2 people early last year showing up as already having survived when tested to go to work in testing for covid. How does that fit in? The point of aquirred vs natural immunity is I think talking about same thing. Do people who already recovered from covid need vax? If so, why? What data.
My daughter in law had in Nov pre vax available. She has already been told get vax for cruise. Why?
I am sorry if my questions seem misplaced but I would like to hear full explaination of these mandates. What data used, what discarded. A lot of broad statements without full disclosure or discussion.
We go for our 2nd shot and wonder if is best choice. After son/daughter in law situation at that age is doubtful either could excape contact transfer unless contagion had very short shelf life.
I wonder about these things and do not mind being a lab rat, but like to fully understand real risk.
Thor Forums
