Quote:
Originally Posted by 16ACE27
Probably rear axle loading (bathroom in the back) and tow capacity. Just a guess.
|
Interesting enough, by going to shorter wheelbase (unless it’s a misprint) compared to 24.1 which is same length overall, they are placing even more weight on rear axle in addition to rear bathroom. That’s probably a good revision because it uses more of the rear axle’s unused capacity and unloads the front axle some which are sometimes close to max.
With a larger slide (almost full wall length), I would guess the front driver’s wheel would have been loaded fairly close to max which may explain the shorter wheelbase. Who knows, they may have done it for some completely different reason.
Thor Forums
