Quote:
Originally Posted by raffaelli
Togo went to market with a product specifically designed around a particular plan and did not have the provider of that plan locked in for a reasonable duration. I am assuming ATT pulled out when they saw the impact to the network. ATT apparently had the option to do that because of a weak or non-existent contractual obligation with Togo. The unintended consequence for Togo is that this now becomes a bait and switch scam. The blame is squarely on Togo.
|
I totally disagree with you on this. For it to be a bait and switch scam you would need to show intent and I don't think it was Togo or Wineguards intent to scam customers for one year. It was poor business practices for not signing AT&T to a multi year contract. The blame is squarely on AT&T.