Quote:
Originally Posted by JamieGeek
So in the Sprinter example the difference is only 3lbs? Hardly anything to worry about (er slide vs no slide weght that is--as far as the ccc yeah it needs to go on a diet).
Ah but the Sunseeker 2400B & 2400Q: They both have slides, just one is bigger than the other:
2400B:
2400Q:
So they both have the mechanism.
Oh and one has the kitchen on one side vs the other which has the kitchen on the other side. Make it even more interesting that they are only 3lbs different.
Also note that the 2400W has a very similar floorplan (looks like it is now discontinued, however). |
Yes, they are both similar in overall size and with similar weight even though one has larger slide, which is why I used as an example to show that it’s not only slides that cause CCC limitations. I’m trying to remain objective while hoping to discuss issue of insufficient CCC brought up by others in a different thread. Concern is not limited to Thor.
Sprinter motorhomes appear some of the worst in this area. Maybe it’s low GVWR (11,030 pounds) along with high buyer expectations. Brands like Tiffin Wayfarer have received negative feedback related to weight.
I agree with Dave’s point that you can make +/- 1,080 pounds work if it’s a couple and pack light, but then what’s the point of extra seats, beds, and all that storage space sending buyers the message that the motorhome can easily accommodate four people.
For what it’s worth, a smaller Sunseeker motorhome built on a Transit chassis with GVWR of only 10,360 pounds has a listed CCC of 2,215 pounds. There seems to be little consistency in Cargo Carrying Capacity manufacturers provide, as if it’s an afterthought, or at least a low design priority.
Perhaps Bob will share actual data on his rig.
Thor Forums
